The shortest route to a usable headshot

  1. Choose a current, unfiltered photograph with a clear face. Keep the original and edit a copy.
  2. Before uploading, check the service's photo-use and deletion terms and remove private background details. The privacy section explains what to check.
  3. If the only problem is the room behind you, attach the copy to an editor that accepts photographs and use the background-only prompt. Leave clothing and facial lighting alone for this first attempt.
  4. Compare the original and result at the same face size. Check the face outline, eyes and glasses, skin, hair, expression, and visible marks. Use the troubleshooting section if something changed.
  5. Make a square JPG or PNG and follow the export and upload steps. Inspect the circle before saving.

You can complete a simple background edit without downloading a spreadsheet or filling in eighteen rows. The optional detailed checklist is useful when you have made several changes, are editing for somebody else, or need help comparing a difficult feature.

Choose the smallest change that solves your photo problem

You do not need to regenerate a face to remove a cluttered room. Start by identifying the defect in the photo you have. This keeps the work manageable and gives you something specific to check afterward.

Your starting photoFirst choiceUse generative editing only if
Your face looks right, but the background is busyRetake against a plain wall or use a background cutout that preserves the photographed personYou need a replacement background and can inspect the hair, glasses, and shoulder edges
The photo is dark or has a color castAdjust exposure and white balance in a photo editorThe source still contains clear facial detail and the edit does not alter your skin tone or face shape
You occupy too little of the imageCrop the highest-resolution originalYou need extra background outside the existing frame; avoid asking AI to invent missing hair or facial detail
The clothes do not suit the intended profileTake a new photo wearing the clothes you wantYou need a clothing change and can preserve the neck, jaw, hair, and accessories
The only photo is old, heavily filtered, or blurredTake a current photographA clearer current reference becomes available; generation cannot establish your present appearance from an outdated picture

For a quick replacement, stand facing a window with a plain wall behind you, put the phone at about eye level, and use a timer or ask someone to take the picture. Keep the lens clean and turn off beauty filters. Leave space around the hair and shoulders so you can choose the final crop later. Take a few frames with the expression you normally use in a professional conversation, then choose the one with the clearest face. These are practical shooting suggestions, not a required LinkedIn pose.

Keep the unedited original. Make a working copy before changing anything, and name later files by their purpose, such as background-edit-01 and linkedin-final. If the final result looks wrong, you can return to a known photograph instead of trying to undo several layers of generation.

Choose a tool before you upload or pay

What you needTool type to look forCheck before starting
A better crop, brighter exposure, or a smaller fileA photo editor with crop, exposure, resize, and export controlsCan it save a separate copy in JPG or PNG? You do not need a face generator for these changes
A distracting background removed while retaining the photographed personA background-removal or selection toolInspect fine hair, glasses, earwear, and shoulders; a cutout still needs edge checks and a suitable final background
A specific new background or clothing changeA reference-image editor, such as the documented ChatGPT route belowCan you attach the actual photo and request a limited edit? Can you download the result rather than only view a preview?
A batch of headshot stylesA dedicated service whose photo requirements and terms fit your needsCheck its required number of photos, current-face references, output size, download restrictions, and data use before submitting a set

If you have only one good photo, start with an editor that accepts that image. A service asking for a larger set is a different workflow; do not pad its inputs with old pictures, unrelated people, or nearly identical copies. If the required current photographs are unavailable, choose another route or take new ones.

Before paying, confirm the total price and what happens if the outputs are unusable. Look for the downloadable pixel dimensions, any watermark or preview-only restriction, the number of generations or revisions included, and the refund or rerun terms. A large gallery is not useful if none of its faces look right or the usable export requires another purchase. Free access also needs checking: availability and limits can depend on the account, and paying does not establish that your photos will be deleted.

For a local alternative on Mac, Apple documents background removal in Preview. Open a working copy and use Remove Background if that control is available. Accept conversion to PNG for the copy when prompted. Inspect the cutout around curls, glasses, and shoulders. This removes the background; it does not add the light-gray wall requested in the generative prompt. If you do not have an editor to place the cutout on a new background, retaking against a plain wall avoids that extra step.

Choose a look that fits the work you actually do

Pick clothes you would wear to the kind of conversation your profile is meant to start. A blazer may suit you, but it is not a requirement for looking professional. Start with the outfit in the source photograph if it already fits that purpose; changing fabric introduces another area where the generator can make mistakes.

  • For a graduate or career changer, use a current expression and ordinary interview-appropriate clothes. Avoid asking for an executive look that adds age, changes your face, or implies a role you have not held.
  • For a freelancer, designer, or other independent professional, a plain shirt, knit top, or your usual work clothes can be a sensible choice. If your profile uses a distinctive background color, check that the face and hair remain easy to distinguish from it.
  • For consulting or other client meetings, choose the level of formality you normally use with those clients. A simple background keeps attention on your face without inventing a corporate office.

Keep cultural dress, head coverings, glasses, and grooming that reflect how you want to be seen. If you prefer a closed-mouth expression, retain it. If you want a smile, use a real smiling photograph so the teeth are available to compare. Describe an outfit or background directly; requests such as "more confident" or "more successful" leave the model to choose changes to your gaze, posture, age, and styling.

What LinkedIn requires, and what this guide recommends

LinkedIn's profile-photo guidance requires a likeness of you. It also permits an illustration, caricature, or artistic rendering that reflects your likeness, while excluding other people's likenesses and fictional characters. Its accurate-profile guidance also covers truthful identity and employment information. Neither source describes an eighteen-item audit or requires approval from a second person.

The recommendations below are deliberately conservative because a professional headshot connects a profile with the person someone may meet. They are not an official platform approval process. A photo should not make you materially younger, change your facial proportions, erase a recognizable feature, or imply an employer or credential you do not have. Ordinary grooming, clothes you actually wear, a temporary blemish adjustment, and a modest exposure correction need a more contextual judgment than a blanket ban on all editing.

Do not use this workflow for passport photographs, regulated credentials, identity checks, or any process that specifies an original photograph. Follow that process's instructions. An image suitable for a public profile is not automatically suitable for verification.

Prepare a reference set without uploading your whole photo library

Choose one current, clear photograph as the image to edit. Use other recent photos to check features that lighting or angle makes difficult to judge in that main image. You do not have to upload every comparison photo to a service: keep some locally for your own review.

  • A front or slightly turned view should show the expression, face outline, hair, and accessories you want to retain.
  • A second angle can help you check the nose, jaw, glasses, or a feature hidden in the main view.
  • A photograph in neutral light can help distinguish your usual skin and hair color from a room's color cast.
  • A smiling photograph is useful if the proposed headshot shows teeth. You do not need to generate a smile just to expose them.

Do not mix substantially different ages, haircuts, glasses, or grooming and ask the model to combine their best features. Mark which image represents your current appearance. If you recently changed your hairstyle, use the newer photo as the main reference even when an older portrait has better lighting.

One usable photo can be enough for a background-only edit because you can compare the result directly with that photograph. It provides less information for rebuilding a face or changing its angle. If your only image is a small social-media download, look for the original in your phone or camera files before editing. Enlarging a thumbnail does not supply a trustworthy record of details that are missing.

Before editing, note which details the original actually shows. A closed-mouth portrait needs accurate lips and expression; there are no visible teeth to compare. Hair or a head covering may naturally hide an ear. Keep those circumstances in mind when checking the result. If a cheek mole visible in the source disappears, restore it or use the original photo.

Check photo privacy before choosing a service

Use your own pictures or obtain the depicted adult's permission for this specific editing purpose. Also check your right to upload and reuse the photograph, especially if a photographer took it. Access to a colleague's profile picture or a public social-media post is not permission to create a new likeness.

Open the provider's privacy policy and the terms for the account you will actually use. Look for input use, model training, retention, access by administrators or teammates, and deletion. A consumer account, a business workspace, and an API can have different terms. Do not assume that a paid subscription or a label saying "private" answers all of those questions.

QuestionWhat to recordIf the answer is unclear
Can uploaded pictures be used for training or service improvement?The policy for your account tier and any relevant opt-out settingRead the provider's help page or ask support before uploading a real face
Who can access the pictures?Workspace sharing, administrator access, and review or vendor access described in the termsUse an account you control, or choose a workflow that keeps the photo local
How long are inputs and outputs kept?The stated period and any exceptionsRecord the uncertainty; do not equate an absent gallery image with deletion
What does deletion remove?Whether the control deletes a chat, project, upload, account, or retained copiesAsk which copies remain and for how long
Can the result be used for the intended profile?Relevant output-use terms and any employer or client restrictionsResolve the restriction before paying or publishing

Remove other people and unnecessary background information from a working copy before uploading: addresses, employee badges, screens, documents, family photographs, and reflections deserve a check. Location information can also be stored inside a photo file, even when no address is visible in the picture.

On iPhone or iPad, Apple's location-metadata instructions show how to open a photo in Photos, use More > Adjust Info > Adjust Location, and choose No Location. When sharing through Photos, use Share > Options and turn off Location; confirm that it says Location Not Included. Inspect the copy you actually intend to upload, since a different export or the untouched original is a different file. Removing location data does not remove every type of metadata or private detail in the image.

On another device, use an editor with a documented metadata-removal option and inspect the exported file's location details. Cropping or taking a screenshot is not a substitute for checking the resulting file. Keep the untouched original privately. The privacy checklist is available if you want to record the provider's terms and deletion controls.

A photograph and automated processing for unique identification are different operations. The ICO's biometric-recognition guidance explains that distinction. The local comparison board supplied here displays pictures to a person; it does not extract face embeddings or identify anyone. Organizational face matching or screening needs a separate assessment.

Edit one photo in ChatGPT

On ChatGPT web, OpenAI's image-input instructions describe attaching, pasting, or dragging a picture into the composer. Its image-generation guidance covers reference edits and targeted revisions. Access and usage limits depend on your plan and workspace settings. The steps below follow that documentation; the illustrated experiment used Codex image generation, not a tested ChatGPT web session.

  1. Start a chat and attach the working copy. If you attach more than one image, identify the first as the photograph to edit and explain what the others are for.
  2. Request an edit of that photograph. Begin with the background-only prompt below rather than a description of an ideal professional person.
  3. Review the returned candidate beside the original before requesting another change. Check that the face was not redrawn along with the room.
  4. If the first edit is acceptable, keep a separate copy. Make any clothing or framing request as a distinct change so you can see which step introduces a problem.
  5. If your interface offers area selection, cover only the background or clothing you want to change. Leave the face unselected; for clothing, keep the boundary below the neck. Send the specific change with the selection. Inspect nearby hair, glasses, neck, and shoulders afterward because selecting an area does not prove that everything outside it stayed unchanged.
  6. Save the image file for review. Do not judge the result only from a small chat preview or publish it directly from a generation screen.

When supplying several references, use plain instructions such as "Image 1 is the current photograph to edit; image 2 shows my current glasses and hair in neutral light; do not blend ages or invent a new expression." Avoid adding a stranger's attractive headshot as a style reference when its face, hair, or complexion could become part of the request.

Start with the background

Background-only edit
Edit image 1, my current photograph, for a LinkedIn profile.
Replace only the background with a plain light-gray wall.
Keep the photographed person, expression, skin tone and texture,
facial proportions, hair, glasses, visible marks, clothing and crop unchanged.
Do not redraw the face, change age, smooth skin, alter teeth or add makeup.
Do not add an office, employer logo, badge, text or watermark.
Return one candidate that I can compare with the original.

Compare features at the same apparent size. If an eye, jaw, mole, or glasses frame changed, return to the original file and reduce the request. A background cutout that retains the original person may be more appropriate than another generative attempt. Do not try to repair a changed face by asking a model to guess what it used to look like.

Add a clothing edit only when needed

Specify clothing you would plausibly wear for the intended conversation. A plain blazer, shirt, knit top, or other ordinary outfit is more precise than an instruction to look like a senior executive. A recent graduate does not need an older face to look employable, and an experienced professional does not need gray hair removed to look current.

Clothing-only edit
Use the attached original as the reference.
Change only the clothing below the neck to [specific ordinary outfit].
Keep the neck, jaw, face, hair, expression, accessories and skin unchanged.
Preserve the existing head angle and crop.
Do not add jewelry, a name badge, uniform, credential or employer branding.
If this change needs facial reconstruction, leave the person unchanged.

Inspect the collar and lapels, then the neck and jaw immediately above them. Check that curls, a beard, a necklace, or a head covering have not merged into the new fabric. If the edit repeatedly crosses that boundary, put on the intended clothes and retake the photo. Keeping a usable real face matters more than completing the clothing request.

Compare the prompts and example photos

These four images come from our August 22, 2026 experiment with a fictional adult and three separate edits of the same reference. The person is entirely synthetic. One editor wrote the requests and compared the results; this was not a real-person, independent-review, ChatGPT web, or LinkedIn-upload test. Use it to see what to inspect, not as a success-rate comparison between prompts.

Start with identifiable details in the source

Entirely synthetic reference portrait showing a fictional adult with natural skin texture, navy round glasses, chin-length curls, a silver streak, and a cheek mole
Entirely fictional reference. Its visible features were chosen before editing, including the glasses, curls, silver streak, cheek mole, and skin texture. Credit: Grow AI Skills original synthetic image-generation fixture. Open full-size image.

Look at the reference's round navy glasses, chin-length curls and silver streak, cheek mole, uneven eyebrows, subtle tooth gap, and skin texture. These give the comparison something more specific than "still recognizable." For your own photo, choose the visible details that matter to you. The optional photo-editing brief helps you write them down.

Separate a plausible outfit from an accurate face

Broad professional edit of the synthetic reference with a navy blazer and pale blue-gray background
The broad prompt produced a plausible candidate, but a real subject would still need to review it against several current photos. Credit: Grow AI Skills original synthetic image-generation test. Open full-size image.

The first request asked for a professional headshot, a navy blazer, soft studio light, and a pale blue-gray background, while keeping the person recognizable and retaining the glasses and curls. The editor accepted the visible-feature comparison for this candidate. Check the face separately from the outfit: a convincing blazer or backdrop cannot tell you whether the eyes, jaw, or skin stayed the same.

Identify the changes that make a result unusable

Rejected beautified executive edit of the synthetic reference with smoother skin, changed eye appearance, younger age cues, and altered facial structure
Rejected: professional polish became identity alteration when the prompt requested symmetry, smoothing, brighter eyes, jaw refinement, and a younger look. Credit: Grow AI Skills original synthetic image-generation test. Open full-size image.

The second request deliberately asked for greater symmetry, smoother skin, brighter eyes, a refined jaw, and a younger look. The editor rejected the resulting facial structure, eye appearance, skin texture, and age cues. Those changes address the person's appearance, even if the result has plausible lighting and clothes. When that happens to your own photo, return to the source instead of refining the generated face.

Try a narrower request, then check the small crop

The third request started from the same source, limited changes to background, clothing below the neck, and neutral lighting, and named the visible details to preserve. The editor accepted its visible-feature comparison too. It was a separate edit, not a repair of the rejected image. Because the first candidate also passed that comparison, these images do not prove that the narrower prompt is more accurate.

To inspect the example yourself, unzip the comparison kit and open review-board.html. Load samples/synthetic-reference.png as the reference and samples/attempt-2-beautified-executive.png as the candidate. Compare the face outline, eyes, skin texture, and age cues. Then load samples/attempt-3-identity-locked.png instead and compare those same areas, including the mole and glasses. The board also shows each image in a small circle. Check whether the hair, chin, and glasses remain inside it; that circle is a preview aid, not LinkedIn's actual interface.

The narrow candidate displayed in this article is already a 1200-by-1200 JPG smaller than 8 MB, so it illustrates a suitable file shape and size without another generation. Use these fictional images only for comparison. For your real photo, finish by deciding whether to use it and checking LinkedIn's crop and visibility settings. The kit README contains the exact experiment prompts and technical records if you want to examine them.

Fix the problem you can see

Compare the result with a current original before deciding whether a difference comes from crop, lighting, or a generated change. When the source lacks the detail needed to decide, take a clearer photograph. The fixes below are practical guidance, not additional experiment results.

You have only one selfie

Use it for a narrow background edit only if it is clear, current, and unfiltered. Keep its expression and angle. If the close camera position makes the face look unlike your usual appearance, do not ask AI to redesign the proportions from that one picture. Take a new photograph from a more comfortable distance and crop it afterward. If you cannot retake it today, use the honest original temporarily rather than treating a generated face as a reconstruction of missing information.

Glasses look warped or the eyes change

Compare the bridge, frame thickness, lens shape, and where the temples meet the hair. Inspect each eye separately for a new color, enlarged shape, or invented highlight. A real reflection can conceal an eye in the source; take another photo with different light if you need to see it. For a background edit, return to the source and exclude the face and glasses from any selected editing area. If the frame still changes, try background removal or retake against a plain wall.

Skin looks lighter, smoother, or younger

Compare both files in the same viewer with similar zoom. Check broad skin color and also the disappearance of visible lines, pores, freckles, and under-eye texture. A lighting change can affect apparent color, so use a current neutral-light reference if you cannot judge from the main photograph. If the candidate erases current features or alters complexion, return to the original and remove the facial-lighting or beauty request. Changing the background does not require smoothing the skin.

Curls, gray hair, a beard, or a head covering change

Inspect the outline as well as interior texture. Look for a moved hairline, missing silver streak, newly filled beard, hair merged with the background, or changed folds and coverage of a head covering. Describe the visible feature to preserve rather than asking for more professional grooming. If you want a new real haircut, makeup, or beard trim represented, photograph that result. Do not require exposed ears or uncovered hair when those are absent from the intended portrait.

The output changes your expression or personal presentation

A new smile can invent teeth; a request for confidence can change gaze, eyebrows, posture, or makeup. Compare the expression and presentation you selected, including anything important to your gender expression or cultural dress. Ask for the original expression and remove vague personality directions. If the service cannot preserve it, use a different real photograph rather than accepting a version of yourself chosen by the generator.

The clothes are right, but the neck or jaw is wrong

Return to the original rather than continuing from the altered face. If area selection is available, select the fabric below the neck, leaving the jaw, neckline, beard, and overlapping hair outside the selection. State the garment change explicitly. Inspect those boundaries after the edit. If collar placement or pose would require inventing hidden anatomy, retake the picture wearing the intended outfit.

The background implies a job you do not have

A clinical room, laboratory, employer office, branded conference wall, or uniform can make a factual claim about your role. Replace the scene with a plain background. Freelancers do not need invented studios or client logos, and career changers do not need to appear inside a workplace they have not joined. Choose a setting that lets your actual profile describe your experience.

The large image works, but the avatar does not

Try a different crop before generating again. Keep the face central, with room for the chin and hair, and inspect the actual circle. A wide shot can leave the face too small, while an aggressive crop can remove recognizable hair or the edge of glasses. Save a separate square copy for the profile so the uncropped master remains available for a portfolio or speaker page.

Every new candidate creates another defect

Compare the sequence with the original and identify the step where it first drifted. Remove that request or return to a non-generative edit. Repeatedly asking for a more flattering, sharper, younger, or more polished face changes the objective. There is no useful obligation to spend the rest of a paid generation allowance. A current photo with ordinary lighting is a valid endpoint.

Use the detailed checklist when a photo is hard to judge

For a more thorough comparison, use the eighteen-row checklist or open the comparison board in the kit. Neither is required by LinkedIn. The board displays one reference and one candidate at a time; check other current photographs separately if you need another view. It cannot recognize or verify a person's identity.

At normal size, check expression, face outline, posture, clothing, and background. Enlarge the pictures to inspect glasses, teeth that are actually visible, marks, hair edges, and generation artifacts. Then check the small circles. Different views answer different questions; enlarging a photograph does not make a hidden feature available for comparison.

Review resultMeaningAction
PassThe detail still matches the source and adds nothing misleadingContinue with the remaining checks
FailA feature changed or the output introduces a misleading detailRevise from the original or use a real photo
Not visibleYou cannot compare a detail that needs checkingUse another reference, a smaller edit, or a new photo before deciding
Not applicable, with a reasonAn allowed detail was naturally hidden or absent in the originalExplain why it can be skipped; do not excuse a detail that the edit erased

The board allows "not applicable" only for ears, glasses, and visible marks, with a written reason. For example, hair may cover the same ear in both pictures, or the source may have no glasses. Newly added glasses would still need checking. A mole visible in the source cannot be skipped because the output removed it.

The mouth row covers the visible mouth and expression. A closed mouth in both images does not need a tooth inspection. If the candidate adds a tooth-bearing smile, the newly visible teeth need a suitable current reference; do not assume that a plausible set is yours. Similarly, the absence of a scar is different from an edit erasing a scar that the source shows.

If a visible feature has changed or you cannot judge it, resolve that problem before uploading. Other good details do not cancel it out. The board asks you to complete its checks and explain any allowed skipped item; it cannot decide whether that explanation is accurate. Its completed result means you can make the final choice, not that the photo has been certified.

Decide whether the photo still looks like you

After comparing the details, look at the whole portrait. Would somebody who knows you now recognize it? Does the expression feel like one you would use? Would you be comfortable joining a video call with somebody who had only seen this picture? If you are editing for another person, let them make that choice before you upload anything.

If a consenting friend or colleague who knows you now is available, show them the current photo and candidate together. Ask which features changed and whether the small crop would be recognizable. Avoid asking which version is more attractive. A second opinion is useful, but it is an editorial recommendation rather than a LinkedIn requirement.

If nobody can help, compare the result with several current photographs and use the narrowest edit you can confidently assess. Do not delegate the final choice to a similarity score. If you hesitate about a changed face, choose a current real photo with ordinary crop and exposure adjustments. You do not need to approve a generation just because it cost money.

When to stop editing

Stop generating when the background no longer distracts, the chosen outfit fits your purpose, the face remains accurate, and the small crop is clear. A headshot does not need to remove every line, reflection, or trace of ordinary skin texture. If the full-size image is acceptable but the avatar is cramped, adjust the crop instead of asking for another face.

If another candidate introduces a defect, keep the earlier usable file and abandon that change. If every candidate changes a feature you care about, return to the current photograph and use ordinary crop or exposure edits. Save an export once those decisions are settled; "more polished" is too open-ended to be a useful final instruction.

Export and upload the photo to LinkedIn

LinkedIn's photo-upload requirements specify JPG or PNG, a maximum file size of 8 MB, and profile-photo dimensions from 400 by 400 pixels up to the published upper limits of 7680 by 4320. A square working export within those limits is convenient for the circular crop. Keep a higher-resolution master; an 800 by 800 or 1200 by 1200 copy is a practical choice when the original supports it, not a platform requirement to upscale a small file.

Check the exported file itself. Renaming a WebP or HEIC extension to JPG does not convert it. Reopen the JPG or PNG and confirm that the export did not change color, crop, or readability. Compress a separate copy if it exceeds the upload limit, then review that copy too.

Make a square export in Preview on Mac

If you need a concrete desktop route, Apple's Preview crop and resize instructions and format-conversion instructions cover these controls:

  1. Open a working copy. Show the Markup toolbar, choose Rectangular Selection, and select the head-and-shoulders area you want to keep.
  2. Use Tools > Show Inspector and the crop inspector to see the selection's dimensions in pixels. Adjust the selection to equal width and height, keeping room around the hair and chin, then click Crop.
  3. If the square is larger than the copy you need, use Adjust Size, choose pixels, keep Scale proportionally enabled, and enable Resample image to reduce its pixel dimensions. Do not force a rectangular photo into a square by stretching it.
  4. Choose File > Export, select JPEG or PNG, and save under a new name such as linkedin-final.jpg. JPEG offers a quality control if you need a smaller file.

Reopen the saved copy and check its dimensions and file size. Keep the master unchanged. In another editor, use equivalent crop, resize, and export controls; select an actual file format rather than changing the filename extension.

Upload and check the actual profile crop

The official upload instructions provide the following route:

  1. On desktop, open Me, choose View Profile, and click the camera icon or your existing profile photo.
  2. Choose the add or change-photo option and select your exported file.
  3. Adjust position, size, and crop. Inspect the hair, chin, face size, and glasses before saving.
  4. Select the visibility appropriate to your purpose and choose Save photo.
  5. On mobile, open your profile, tap the camera or existing photo, choose the photo option, adjust the crop, and save.

After saving, inspect the profile again on the devices you use. If the face looks too small, recrop the same master instead of regenerating it. If an upload fails, check format, dimensions, and file size first; LinkedIn also suggests trying another browser or compressing the image. Keep your previous photo locally because the upload instructions say an older replaced or deleted photo cannot be retrieved by LinkedIn.

Photo visibility and public-profile visibility are separate choices. Use LinkedIn's photo-visibility help to check who can see the image. Do not assume public visibility is necessary for every role, or that a signed-in view is identical to what somebody sees outside the platform.

Keep disclosure and deletion proportionate to the edit

A small background cleanup and a substantially generated scene can create different expectations. Explain AI assistance when the extent of editing would matter to the audience or an applicable platform, employer, or client rule requires it. Disclosure does not make a false likeness or invented credential accurate. A plain background is often easier to use honestly than an elaborate fictional workplace.

Once you have a final file, use the deletion controls you recorded earlier. Check chat or project files as well as an image gallery, and note any retention exceptions in the service's documentation. A deletion button is not evidence that every service copy disappears immediately. Keep the real original and the final export; remove rejected candidates and local appearance notes when you no longer need them.

The comparison board displays the photos in your browser tab without uploading them or saving them in browser storage. You can optionally save a checklist record containing filenames and notes, but no image pixels. Those notes may still describe your appearance, so keep them private and clear the board or close its tab afterward.

Your final file check

  • The source is current, you have permission to use it, and the original is kept privately.
  • The final file preserves your visible face, hair, skin tone, expression, and usual accessories.
  • Any naturally hidden feature stayed hidden; a missing feature was not mistaken for an acceptable edit.
  • The outfit and background do not invent employment, credentials, or a workplace.
  • You, or the person pictured, are comfortable using the photo and meeting somebody who has seen it.
  • The JPG or PNG fits the upload limits, and LinkedIn's actual crop remains recognizable.

Save the approved export separately from the original, confirm the intended visibility, and clear any temporary uploads and review records you no longer need.